• 12 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 24th, 2023

help-circle

  • ironFox principally

    Curious why?

    I took a brief look and found some experience breaking changes like no dark mode and a general don’t do this since it can be a privacy risk even at the cost of speed which firefox has not been known for ages.

    Some points which I observed:

    • Dark Reader is known to be incompatible with IronFox’s changes and will cause significant breakage/slowdowns.

    • Dark mode for websites is disabled due to resist fingerprinting. Please do not disable RFP.

    • IronFox disables the JavaScript JIT to increase security at the cost of slowing down webapps, complex websites, and the PDF viewer. Navigate to about:config and change javascript.options.ion and javascript.options.baselinejit to true to restore their performance, though this is not recommended.

    • IronFox has strict certificate revocation checks. The CA revocation servers are occasionally down/blocked/inaccessible, so you may see a “Secure Connection Failed” error from time to time. Navigate to about:config and change security.OCSP.require to false, this is however a security and privacy risk.

    • IronFox requires safe renegotiation for connections. Certain websites do not support this and will result in a “Secure Connection Failed” error. Please report these errors to the impacted websites. You can navigate to about:config and set security.ssl.require_safe_negotiation to false to disable the requirement for safe renegotiations, this is however a security and privacy risk

    • IronFox has stripped referrers. This often breaks loading of images on websites with hotlink protection. Navigate to about:config and change network.http.referer.XOriginPolicy from 2 to 1 (or 0 if you’re still having issues), this is however a privacy risk.

    • IronFox has visited link highlighting disabled by default. Navigate to about:config and change layout.css.visited_links_enabled to true if needed, this is however a privacy risk
















  • Pixel 8 did not get the multi model Gemini update simply because it lacked the additional RAM needed for the LLM. Its the same with this feature. They brought battery health and charge counter in android 14.

    They could’ve bought this to pixel phones if google did not skimp on the hardware.

    Software updates will always have hardware limitations

    I know but, since they were going to work on this feature and had starting with android 14. It does not make sense to skimp on it for a year old hardware. Same with the RAM limitation on the pixel 8.

















OSZAR »